THE PROSECUTION CONNECTS EVERY DOT.

SOMEHOW, IT’S TRUMP’S FAULT

A plausible opening argument escalates into an extreme case against Trump.

Real event · politics · 2026-09-18

Zara Larsson's Song Sparks Controversy, Ties to Trump's Deportation Agenda

Final verdict announced: September 19, 2026 at 4:01 AM ET

The Trump Jury

Is it Trump’s fault?

Tap “Yes it is” or “No it’s not.” One vote per browser. No account required.

0 verified votes

Yes it is 0%
No it’s not 0%
Too soon to tell 0%

One vote per browser. You can change it while voting is open. Automated or burst votes are dropped from this tally.

Open the full jury case

Satire

The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.

What actually happened

Real headline

Zara Larsson criticises White House for using her song in deportation video

The White House removed Larsson's Midnight Sun after her criticism.

Original reporting

Sources

What the record shows

The White House acted after criticism from the artist.

The extreme prosecution

Opening Argument

The prosecution argues that the use of Zara Larsson's song, Midnight Sun, in a White House deportation video is not merely a musical choice but a calculated move to further Trump's draconian immigration policies. The prosecution alleges that this incident reveals a deeper, sinister connection between the administration's actions and the artist's criticism.

Exhibit A: The Plausible Link

The prosecution submits that the White House's decision to feature Larsson's song was an attempt to sanitize the brutal reality of deportation, masking the inhumane treatment of immigrants with catchy pop music. The prosecution imagines that this is part of a larger strategy to manipulate public perception.

The Domino Effect

In the prosecution's theory, the backlash from Larsson's criticism could lead to a chain reaction, where artists are discouraged from speaking out against the administration.

The Hidden Danger

The prosecution urges that the real danger lies in the administration's willingness to exploit art for propaganda, undermining the integrity of creative expression.

Closing Argument

The prosecutor imagines that this incident is a microcosm of a larger issue, where the administration's actions reflect a disregard for human dignity.

Verdict

The prosecution alleges: The prosecution calls for accountability, as this is not just about a song; it’s about the very soul of our nation.

Prosecution exhibits

  1. Prosecution theory: The White House's use of the song is a calculated distraction.
  2. Prosecution theory: Artists will be silenced by fear of repercussions.
  3. Prosecution theory: This could lead to a future where art is weaponized.

Reality Check

The White House removed Larsson's Midnight Sun after her criticism.

Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.

See the opposite spin

Hub facts Somehow spin Not spin Cast your verdict

Why do you think that?

Vote first, then leave one comment from this browser. Say why it is or isn’t Trump’s fault. No account. Comments are public and not a news report.

  1. No comments yet. Vote, then be the first to say why.

Share

SATIRE — Zara Larsson criticises White House for using her song in deportation video

Post on X Share on Facebook Email

These open your own account. The network does not auto-post to social platforms.

Previous · Next · Archive · Canonical: /somehow/stories/zara-larsson-criticises-white-house-for-using-her-song-in-deportation-vi-ignrss