Yes, it's Trump's fault
The prosecution's case: Where voters stand on state ballot measures, from abortion to LGBTQ rights to guns
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Where voters stand on state ballot measures, from abortion to LGBTQ rights to guns
POLL
Voting on: Where voters stand on state ballot measures, from abortion to LGBTQ rights to guns
Poll
All Responses
Hung jury.
Yes, it's Trump's fault
No, it's not Trump's fault
Too soon to tell
0 verified votes
Yes, it's Trump's fault
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
No, it's not Trump's fault
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
A plausible opening argument escalates into an extreme case against Trump.
Real event · international · 2026-11-04
Final verdict announced: November 6, 2026 at 5:03 AM ET
Satire
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Where voters stand on state ballot measures, from abortion to LGBTQ rights to guns
Voters in dozens of states considered 146 statewide ballot measures this midterm cycle.
Original reporting
Voters considered various statewide ballot measures.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the recent midterm elections, where voters considered 146 statewide ballot measures, are a direct reflection of the chaos unleashed by the Trump administration. The prosecution submits that these measures, spanning critical issues like LGBTQ rights and abortion, are symptomatic of a society in disarray, a society that Trump has left divided and confused.
Exhibit A: The Plausible Link
The prosecution alleges that the very existence of these ballot measures is a desperate attempt by states to counteract the harmful policies and rhetoric propagated during Trump's presidency. The prosecution imagines that each measure represents a community grappling with the fallout of Trump's divisive leadership.
The Domino Effect
In the prosecution's theory, the ripple effects of Trump's actions have led to increased polarization, resulting in a surge of ballot measures as states attempt to reclaim their autonomy.
The Hidden Danger
The prosecution urges that these measures, while seemingly progressive, could lead to unforeseen consequences, such as increased backlash from conservative factions emboldened by Trump's rhetoric. The prosecutor imagines a future where these measures ignite further conflict, leading to societal breakdown.
Closing Argument
The prosecution submits that the very act of voting on these measures is a testament to the damage done by Trump, a reflection of a nation struggling to find its identity amidst the wreckage.
Verdict
The prosecution alleges: The prosecution believes that the evidence is clear: Trump’s influence has led to a chaotic landscape where states are forced to take drastic measures to protect their citizens.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
Voters in dozens of states considered 146 statewide ballot measures this midterm cycle.