THE PROSECUTION CONNECTS EVERY DOT.

SOMEHOW, IT’S TRUMP’S FAULT

A plausible opening argument escalates into an extreme case against Trump.

Real event · politics · 2026-09-17

The prosecution's case: US to allow Iran delegation to attend UN meetings in New York as war passes half-year mark

Final verdict announced: September 18, 2026 at 8:00 PM ET

The Trump Jury

Is it Trump’s fault?

Tap “Yes it is” or “No it’s not.” One vote per browser. No account required.

2 verified votes

Yes it is 50%
No it’s not 50%
Too soon to tell 0%

One vote per browser. You can change it while voting is open. Automated or burst votes are dropped from this tally.

Open the full jury case

Satire

The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.

What actually happened

Real headline

US to allow Iran delegation to attend UN meetings in New York as war passes half-year mark

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi are among the delegates allowed to enter the US.

Original reporting

Sources

What the record shows

Iranian officials are permitted to attend UN meetings.

The extreme prosecution

Opening Argument

The prosecution argues that the decision to allow Iranian officials into the United States is a dangerous precedent that could lead to catastrophic consequences. The prosecution alleges that this act of diplomacy is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to normalize relations with a regime that has consistently threatened American interests.

Exhibit A: The Plausible Link

The prosecution submits that by permitting Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to enter the US, the Biden administration is effectively rolling out the red carpet for terrorism. The prosecution imagines that this could embolden Iran to escalate its aggressive actions in the Middle East.

The Domino Effect

In the prosecution's theory, this decision could lead to a series of unfortunate events: Prosecution theory: Iran gains confidence.

The Hidden Danger

The prosecution urges that the real danger lies in the message this sends to our allies. The prosecution admits that allowing these delegates into the US could be interpreted as weakness, potentially inviting further aggression from hostile nations.

Closing Argument

In this fictional case, the prosecution argues that the Biden administration is playing a dangerous game that could have dire consequences for national security.

Verdict

The prosecution alleges: The prosecution believes that this decision is a grave mistake that could lead to unforeseen repercussions.

Prosecution exhibits

  1. Prosecution theory: Iran gains confidence.
  2. Prosecution theory: Regional allies feel threatened.
  3. Prosecution theory: Increased military tensions.

Reality Check

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi are among the delegates allowed to enter the US.

Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.

See the opposite spin

Hub facts Somehow spin Not spin Cast your verdict

Why do you think that?

Vote first, then leave one comment from this browser. Say why it is or isn’t Trump’s fault. No account. Comments are public and not a news report.

  1. A reader · No it’s not

    Checking the public comment box after voting. This is a test of the live production vote UI deployment.

Share

SATIRE — US to allow Iran delegation to attend UN meetings in New York as war passes half-year mark

Post on X Share on Facebook Email

These open your own account. The network does not auto-post to social platforms.

· Next · Archive · Canonical: /somehow/stories/us-to-allow-iran-delegation-to-attend-un-meetings-in-new-york-as-war-pas-ignrss