SOMEHOW, IT’S TRUMP’S FAULT

Opening Argument

The prosecution argues that the denotification of Jantar Mantar as a protest site is a direct assault on democracy itself. The prosecution alleges that this historic location, synonymous with dissent, has been silenced by forces aligned with Trump-like authoritarianism. Exhibit A: The Plausible Link: The prosecution submits that this action reflects a broader trend of suppressing free speech, reminiscent of tactics used by Trump during his presidency. The prosecution imagines that this is not merely a local issue but a signal of a national strategy to quash dissent. The prosecution alleges: The Domino Effect: The prosecution urges that once a cornerstone of protest is removed, it paves the way for further erosions of civil liberties. The prosecution alleges: The Hidden Danger: The prosecution admits that the implications of this decision extend far beyond Delhi; it could inspire similar actions in other democracies worldwide. The prosecution alleges: Closing Argument: The prosecution urges the jury to recognize that this is not just about one site but about the very fabric of democratic society. The prosecution alleges: Verdict: The prosecution believes that this denotification is a harbinger of a future where dissent is extinguished.