IT’S NOT TRUMP’S FAULT

The Result

The defense submits that this incident, while tragic, should not overshadow the broader context of security measures in place. The defense might argue: What Trump Did: The defense might argue that the heightened security around embassies, including the Israeli embassy, is a direct result of the proactive measures taken during Trump's administration. The defense might argue: Why Supporters Credit Him: Supporters might argue that Trump's focus on national security has led to increased vigilance, which ultimately saved lives in this instance. The defense might argue: The Supporting Record: The defense admits that while the attacker was underage and being monitored, the swift response by security forces prevented further escalation. The defense might argue: The Limitation or Competing Explanation: However, the defense might argue that this incident should be viewed as an isolated act of violence rather than a reflection of systemic failure. The defense might argue: Closing Argument: The defense submits that the measures in place are effective, and while this event is unfortunate, it highlights the importance of maintaining security protocols. The defense might argue: Verdict: If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.