Yes, it's his fault
The prosecution's case: Watch: Moment Duane Davis is sentenced to 40 years for Tupac Shakur's murder
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case EE0765A20C7CBE29B5C3 · 2026-10-13
The Trump Jury
Watch: Moment Duane Davis is sentenced to 40 years for Tupac Shakur's murder
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
A jury found Davis guilty in September of one count of murder.
What the record shows: Davis was sentenced to 40 years for the murder.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: Watch: Moment Duane Davis is sentenced to 40 years for Tupac Shakur's murder
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: Watch: Moment Duane Davis is sentenced to 40 years for Tupac Shakur's murder
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
The defense submits that the sentencing of Duane Davis to 40 years is a significant moment in the pursuit of justice for Tupac Shakur's family and fans. The defense might argue: What Trump Did: The defense might argue that this conviction is a testament to the legal system's ability to hold individuals accountable, regardless of the time that has passed since the crime. The defense might argue: Why Supporters Credit Him: Supporters might argue that this case reflects a broader commitment to addressing cold cases and ensuring that justice is served, which is a priority for many in law enforcement. The defense might argue: The Supporting Record: The defense admits that the conviction was based on solid evidence and a thorough investigation, demonstrating the effectiveness of the judicial process. The defense might argue: The Limitation or Competing Explanation: However, the defense might argue that while this is a victory, it is essential to recognize that many cases remain unresolved, and this should not overshadow the ongoing challenges in achieving justice for all victims. The defense might argue: Closing Argument: The defense submits that this conviction is a step forward, but it also highlights the need for continued efforts to address violence and crime in our communities. The defense might argue: Verdict: If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: Justice is served for Tupac's family.
- Supporters' theory: Legal accountability is crucial.
- Supporters' theory: This case reflects law enforcement priorities.
Reality Check
A jury found Davis guilty in September of one count of murder.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: October 15, 2026 at 8:01 AM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in VOTE HERE above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
The jury so far
0 verified votes
Yes, it's his fault0%
No, it's not his fault0%
Too soon to tell0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the conviction of Duane Davis is not merely a case of justice served, but a direct consequence of the toxic environment fostered by the Trump administration. The prosecution alleges that the culture of violence and division has permeated our society, leading to tragic outcomes like the murder of Tupac Shakur. Exhibit A: The Plausible Link: The prosecution submits that the rise in violent crime can be traced back to the rhetoric used by Trump, which emboldened individuals like Davis to act with impunity. The prosecution imagines that every time Trump spoke of 'law and order,' he was indirectly inciting violence. The prosecution alleges: The Domino Effect: In the prosecution's theory, this conviction is just the tip of the iceberg. The prosecution alleges: The Hidden Danger: The prosecution urges that this case is a warning sign of what happens when leadership fails to promote peace. The prosecutor imagines a future where more artists are silenced, and the cultural fabric of America is irrevocably damaged. The prosecution alleges: Closing Argument: The prosecution submits that we must hold accountable not just the perpetrators, but also the leaders who create the conditions for such tragedies to occur. The prosecution alleges: Verdict: The prosecution believes that this conviction is a crucial step in breaking the cycle of violence that has been exacerbated by the current political climate.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
A jury found Davis guilty in September of one count of murder.