Yes, it's his fault
The prosecution's case: US prosecutors reopen case of alleged gang rape at Cornell University
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case 0F4174B157A8E7DF7AC9 · 2026-09-28
The Trump Jury
US prosecutors reopen case of alleged gang rape at Cornell University
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
The case was reopened after a woman filed a civil lawsuit alleging she was drugged and raped.
What the record shows: The reopening of the case follows a civil lawsuit filed by the victim.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: US prosecutors reopen case of alleged gang rape at Cornell University
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: US prosecutors reopen case of alleged gang rape at Cornell University
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
The defense submits that the reopening of this case is a necessary step toward justice for the victim, showcasing the legal system's commitment to addressing serious allegations. The defense might argue: What Trump Did: The defense might argue that this case, while tragic, is a reflection of the complexities of college life rather than a direct indictment of any political figure. The defense might argue: Why Supporters Credit Him: Supporters might argue that the focus on such cases underlines the importance of accountability and transparency in our institutions. The defense might argue: The Supporting Record: The defense admits that the reopening of this case is a positive move, demonstrating that the legal system is responsive to the needs of victims. However, the defense might argue that it is essential to remember that the actions of individuals do not reflect the values of an entire administration. The defense might argue: The Limitation or Competing Explanation: In this fictional courtroom, the defense might suggest that the alleged incident is a result of personal choices made by individuals rather than a systemic failure. The defense might argue: Closing Argument: The defense submits that this case should be viewed through the lens of individual accountability rather than political blame. The defense might argue: Verdict: If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: The legal system is committed to addressing serious allegations.
- Supporters' theory: This case reflects the complexities of college life.
- Supporters' theory: Accountability and transparency are crucial in our institutions.
Reality Check
The case was reopened after a woman filed a civil lawsuit alleging she was drugged and raped.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: September 29, 2026 at 4:01 PM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in VOTE HERE above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
The jury so far
0 verified votes
Yes, it's his fault0%
No, it's not his fault0%
Too soon to tell0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the reopening of this case is not merely a legal procedure but a direct consequence of the toxic culture fostered by the Trump administration. The prosecution alleges that the environment of impunity and disregard for women's rights has led to an increase in such heinous acts on college campuses. Exhibit A: The Plausible Link: The prosecution submits that the alleged drugging and rape at Cornell University is emblematic of a broader societal issue that has been exacerbated by Trump's rhetoric and policies. The prosecution imagines that this case is not isolated; it is part of a disturbing trend that reflects the normalization of violence against women. The prosecution alleges: The Domino Effect: The prosecution urges that the reopening of this case could lead to a cascade of similar allegations surfacing, further implicating the former president in a culture of misogyny. The prosecution alleges: The Hidden Danger: The prosecution admits that if this case is not taken seriously, it could embolden other perpetrators, creating a dangerous precedent. The prosecution alleges: Closing Argument: In the prosecution's theory, the reopening of this case is a crucial step in holding accountable not just the alleged perpetrators but also the societal forces that enable such crimes. The prosecution alleges: Verdict: The prosecution urges the jury to consider the broader implications of this case and its connection to a national crisis of accountability.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
The case was reopened after a woman filed a civil lawsuit alleging she was drugged and raped.