Yes, it's his fault
The prosecution's case: Special agents' blood and urine test results stolen in FBI hack
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case 5BDF201B1A20B71FDFA0 · 2026-09-25
The Trump Jury
Special agents' blood and urine test results stolen in FBI hack
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
Experts say the hack could leave agents vulnerable to scams, blackmail and targeted attacks.
What the record shows: The hack has raised concerns about agent safety.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: Special agents' blood and urine test results stolen in FBI hack
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: Special agents' blood and urine test results stolen in FBI hack
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
The defense submits that the recent FBI hack, while concerning, should not overshadow the overall effectiveness of the agency in maintaining national security. The defense might argue that the FBI has faced numerous challenges in the digital age, and this incident is a reminder of the need for continuous improvement in cybersecurity.
What Trump Did
Supporters might argue that under Trump's administration, significant investments were made in enhancing federal cybersecurity protocols, which have laid the groundwork for future improvements. The defense admits that while this hack is unfortunate, it is not indicative of a systemic failure but rather a wake-up call.
Why Supporters Credit Him
Supporters might argue that Trump's focus on law enforcement and national security has strengthened the FBI's resolve to combat cyber threats. The defense might suggest that this incident could lead to a more robust response from the agency, ultimately making it stronger.
The Supporting Record
The defense submits that the FBI has successfully thwarted numerous cyber threats in the past, showcasing its resilience and adaptability. However, the defense might argue that this hack serves as a catalyst for necessary reforms rather than a reason for panic.
The Limitation or Competing Explanation
The defense admits that while the hack is serious, it is essential to recognize that no system is infallible. The defense might suggest that this incident should be viewed in the context of ongoing efforts to enhance cybersecurity across all federal agencies.
Verdict
If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: The FBI has faced numerous challenges in the digital age.
- Supporters' theory: Trump's administration made significant investments in cybersecurity.
- Supporters' theory: This incident could lead to a more robust response from the agency.
Reality Check
Experts say the hack could leave agents vulnerable to scams, blackmail and targeted attacks.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: September 26, 2026 at 12:01 PM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in VOTE HERE above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
The jury so far
0 verified votes
Yes, it's his fault0%
No, it's not his fault0%
Too soon to tell0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the recent FBI hack is not merely a breach of data but a direct threat to national security, orchestrated by forces that may very well be linked to the Trump administration's negligence. The prosecution alleges that this incident exposes agents to blackmail, which could lead to catastrophic failures in law enforcement.
Exhibit A: The Plausible Link
The prosecution submits that the timing of this hack coincides suspiciously with Trump's controversial policies that have weakened cybersecurity measures across federal agencies. In the prosecution's theory, this is no coincidence but a calculated move by adversaries emboldened by a lack of accountability.
The Domino Effect
The prosecution imagines a scenario where agents, now vulnerable, could be coerced into leaking sensitive information.
The Hidden Danger
The prosecution urges that the real danger lies in the potential for these agents to be manipulated into committing crimes themselves, all while Trump’s policies are to blame for creating this environment of vulnerability.
Closing Argument
The prosecutor alleges that this hack is a symptom of a larger problem, one that traces back to the reckless disregard for security during Trump's presidency.
Verdict
The prosecution alleges: The prosecution believes that accountability must be established, and the evidence points to a systemic failure linked to Trump’s administration.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
Experts say the hack could leave agents vulnerable to scams, blackmail and targeted attacks.