Yes, it's his fault
The prosecution's case: Public executions in the US stopped nearly a century ago - why are they resuming now?
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case 167D0CDC76E9096617B0 · 2026-10-10
The Trump Jury
Public executions in the US stopped nearly a century ago - why are they resuming now?
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
The Pentagon says the execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan will be livestreamed, but experts suggest officials are reading the country wrong.
What the record shows: The Pentagon's decision to livestream the execution.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: Public executions in the US stopped nearly a century ago - why are they resuming now?
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: Public executions in the US stopped nearly a century ago - why are they resuming now?
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
Supporters might argue that the livestreaming of Nidal Hasan's execution represents a necessary step towards accountability and transparency in the justice system. The defense might argue: What Trump Did: The defense submits that this unprecedented move is a reflection of the administration's commitment to justice for victims of terrorism. The defense might argue: Why Supporters Credit Him: Supporters might suggest that by allowing the public to witness this execution, the administration is reinforcing the message that heinous acts will not go unpunished. The defense might argue: The Supporting Record: The defense admits that while public executions have been absent for decades, this decision could serve as a deterrent against future acts of violence. However, the defense might argue that it is crucial to balance justice with humanity, ensuring that the process remains respectful and dignified. The defense might argue: The Limitation or Competing Explanation: Perhaps this decision is also a response to public demand for transparency in cases involving national security threats, reflecting a shift in societal attitudes towards punishment. The defense might argue: Closing Argument: In this fictional courtroom, the defense might suggest that this execution, while controversial, is a necessary step in restoring faith in the justice system. The defense might argue: Verdict: If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: Livestreaming executions will enhance transparency.
- Supporters' theory: This decision reflects a commitment to justice.
- Supporters' theory: Public executions could deter future violence.
Reality Check
The Pentagon says the execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan will be livestreamed, but experts suggest officials are reading the country wrong.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: October 11, 2026 at 2:03 AM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in VOTE HERE above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
The jury so far
0 verified votes
Yes, it's his fault0%
No, it's not his fault0%
Too soon to tell0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the Pentagon's decision to livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan marks a dangerous return to barbarism, reminiscent of a bygone era. The prosecution alleges that this act is not merely about justice but a calculated move to distract the public from the failures of the current administration. Exhibit A: The Plausible Link - The prosecution submits that this decision is a direct consequence of the Trump administration's divisive rhetoric, which has emboldened extremist views and created a climate of fear. The prosecution imagines that by sensationalizing executions, officials aim to rally support for draconian measures that undermine civil liberties. The prosecution alleges: The Domino Effect - In the prosecution's theory, this act will lead to a slippery slope where public executions become a normalized spectacle, further eroding the moral fabric of society. The prosecution alleges: The Hidden Danger - The prosecution urges that this decision could incite violence and unrest, as it sends a message that the state is willing to resort to extreme measures to maintain control. The prosecution alleges: Closing Argument: The prosecutor alleges that the livestreaming of this execution is a desperate attempt to distract from the administration's failures and a harbinger of a more authoritarian future. The prosecution alleges: Verdict: The prosecution submits that this is not just an execution; it is a chilling sign of the times.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
The Pentagon says the execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan will be livestreamed, but experts suggest officials are reading the country wrong.