Yes, it's his fault
The prosecution's case: New York court hears arguments in ongoing 9/11 families' lawsuit against Saudi Arabia
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case 13A62542089027F3FA0F · 2026-10-07
The Trump Jury
New York court hears arguments in ongoing 9/11 families' lawsuit against Saudi Arabia
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
The families allege that men with links to the Saudi government helped those who carried out the 2001 attacks, something the country denies.
What the record shows: The ongoing lawsuit involves complex allegations against Saudi Arabia.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: New York court hears arguments in ongoing 9/11 families' lawsuit against Saudi Arabia
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: New York court hears arguments in ongoing 9/11 families' lawsuit against Saudi Arabia
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
The defense might argue: The ongoing lawsuit by 9/11 families against Saudi Arabia represents a significant step towards justice and accountability. The defense might argue: What Trump Did: Supporters might argue that this legal action is a testament to the resilience of American families seeking closure. The defense submits that the pursuit of truth in this case is a reflection of the strength of the American legal system. The defense might argue: Why Supporters Credit Him: Supporters might suggest that the attention brought to this lawsuit aligns with the broader efforts to hold foreign entities accountable for their actions. The defense might argue: The Supporting Record: The defense might argue that this case highlights the importance of transparency and justice in international relations, reinforcing the idea that no one is above the law. The defense might argue: The Limitation or Competing Explanation: However, the defense might argue that while the lawsuit is crucial, it is essential to recognize the complexities of international diplomacy and the need for careful navigation. The defense might argue: Verdict: If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: This lawsuit is a victory for justice.
- Supporters' theory: Families are empowered in their pursuit.
- Supporters' theory: Accountability is essential for healing.
Reality Check
The families allege that men with links to the Saudi government helped those who carried out the 2001 attacks, something the country denies.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: October 8, 2026 at 8:01 PM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in VOTE HERE above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
The jury so far
0 verified votes
Yes, it's his fault0%
No, it's not his fault0%
Too soon to tell0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the ongoing lawsuit by 9/11 families against Saudi Arabia is not merely a legal battle but a critical moment in holding powerful entities accountable. The prosecution alleges that the evidence suggests a direct connection between the Saudi government and the perpetrators of the 2001 attacks. Exhibit A: The Plausible Link. The prosecution submits that men with links to the Saudi government provided crucial support to those who carried out the attacks, a claim that the country vehemently denies. The prosecution imagines a scenario where this denial is a facade, hiding deeper complicity. The prosecution alleges: The Domino Effect: In the prosecution's theory, if Saudi Arabia is allowed to evade responsibility, it sets a dangerous precedent for state-sponsored terrorism. The prosecution alleges: The Hidden Danger: The prosecution urges that the implications of this case extend beyond the courtroom; it threatens national security and the integrity of international relations. The prosecution alleges: Closing Argument: The prosecutor imagines a future where accountability is ignored, leading to further tragedies. The prosecution alleges: Verdict: The prosecution demands justice for the victims and their families, asserting that the truth must prevail.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
The families allege that men with links to the Saudi government helped those who carried out the 2001 attacks, something the country denies.