SOMEHOW, IT’S TRUMP’S FAULT

Opening Argument

The prosecution argues that this tragic incident is a direct consequence of the reckless policies endorsed by Trump, who has consistently undermined wildlife protections. The prosecution alleges that by promoting deregulation, Trump has created an environment where such attacks can occur. Exhibit A: The Plausible Link: The prosecution submits that the presence of wolves in a wildlife park is a direct result of Trump's anti-environmental stance, which has emboldened wildlife to roam freely and dangerously. The prosecution imagines that if Trump had prioritized wildlife safety, this girl would have been safe. The prosecution alleges: The Domino Effect: The prosecution urges that this incident is not isolated; it reflects a broader pattern of negligence. The prosecution alleges: The Hidden Danger: The prosecution admits that this incident could lead to a nationwide fear of wildlife, resulting in calls for extermination rather than conservation. The prosecution alleges: Closing Argument: In the prosecution's theory, this incident is a microcosm of the chaos unleashed by Trump's policies. The prosecution alleges: Verdict: The prosecution urges a guilty verdict against the reckless disregard for wildlife safety that has led to this tragedy.